These proposed reforms—particularly the restrictions on serial and parallel inter partes review (“IPR”) challenges and the requirement that petitioners stipulate to litigating validity in only one forum—represent an urgently needed course-correction to restore reliability to U.S. patent rights, strengthen American innovation, and fortify the nation’s technological leadership against foreign adversaries, especially the People’s Republic of China.

State attempts to regulate artificial intelligence violate the Commerce Clause and risk crippling U.S. innovation. Congress must pass a federal moratorium to preempt state fragmentation and promote AI development.

Innovation is not a predictable linear process that begins in a lab and ends with a finished product ready for “access planning.”

Amicus brief of the Committee for Justice filed in Epic v. Google antitrust appeal argues that the lower court injunction violates longstanding antitrust precedent, will result in irreparable harm and is against the public interest.

A patent-value “fee” operates as a direct tax on personal property. Without apportionment, it squarely violates the Constitution.

Europe’s campaign to undermine American tech is finally getting the attention it deserves. Last week, the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing examining how EU laws like the Digital Services Act (DSA) and Digital Markets Act (DMA) are being used to censor speech, punish U.S. companies, and tilt digital markets in favor of European firms.

Amicus brief of the Committee for Justice filed in Epic v. Google antitrust appeal argues that the opinion represents a fundamental break from Supreme Court precedent.

The ruling represents an extreme departure from settled antitrust law. The injunction does not merely prohibit unlawful conduct—it compels Google to open the Play Store it built through years of investment to competitors for free, to distribute its entire app catalog to rival stores, and even to carry those rival stores within its own platform.

The Committee for Justice applauds the committee for allocating $37 million below the 2025 FTC appropriations level.

CFJ applauds 6-3 decision in US v. Skrmetti, upholding TN law that bans puberty blockers and hormone therapy for transgender teens.

In a recent webinar, experts examined how artificial intelligence (AI) is fundamentally upending existing data protection laws and reshaping the debate over privacy protections.

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes’ letter demanding Attorney General Pam Bondi to protect renters from market manipulation argues the Department of Justice should intervene in the housing pricing software market—the exact opposite of what the government should do when it comes to antitrust policy. Imploring Bondi to continue litigating a premature lawsuit the Biden administration initiated against the artificial intelligence-driven company RealPage may be well-intentioned f